Closed jayvdb closed 8 months ago
This is an interesting suggestion, we'll review and and create one if we decide it aligns with cherrybomb's current goals. BTW, do you want to maybe build this check? you can fork the repo and one of us can hop into a call with you to help you get started.
ya I wrote above
I could take this one on as it is a simple check.
I feel like I could get this done on my own - small and simple
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. The
required
list of fields in a schema can get out of sync with the fields actually present in the schema'sproperties
list.This is less likely to occur when the schemas are generated from the application, but more likely in an API-first approach when there app is built from the spec.
Describe the solution you'd like Passive check that detect a name in
required
that isnt inproperties
.Describe alternatives you've considered While this is less about "is the API working correctly", but is the API consistent with itself.
Additional context Provided this feature is desirable in cherrybomb, I could take this one on as it is a simple check.