Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Apache license is actually one of the things we really like about Snappy. If
you must change it, maybe go with something hyper-compatible?
Original comment by bryan.du...@gmail.com
on 24 Mar 2011 at 10:36
Change is too strong of a word. A dual license should work too.
Original comment by taras.g...@gmail.com
on 24 Mar 2011 at 11:26
What do you want to use Snappy for? Dual-licensing can be a bit tricky, so we
generally try to avoid it.
Original comment by se...@google.com
on 25 Mar 2011 at 1:38
I've been planning to compressing various caches in mozilla to reduce disc IO
lag. Snappy seems like it will fit the bill perfectly.
Original comment by taras.g...@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2011 at 1:41
Original comment by se...@google.com
on 25 Mar 2011 at 2:02
I'd like to use it in the Linux kernel together with zram (which currently uses
LZO). For that, AFAIK, it needs a GPL2-compatible license.
Original comment by zeev.tar...@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2011 at 3:05
Okay, sounds good.
Original comment by cdib...@google.com
on 25 Mar 2011 at 4:17
Sounds fine to me
Original comment by dan...@google.com
on 25 Mar 2011 at 4:22
OK, we've changed the license to a BSD-type license. r20 contains the code
updates.
Original comment by se...@google.com
on 25 Mar 2011 at 4:15
Many files still have a header that says "Apache License". Please update all
files. Thank you.
Original comment by zeev.tar...@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2011 at 10:20
Original comment by se...@google.com
on 25 Mar 2011 at 10:39
Fixed in r21.
Original comment by se...@google.com
on 26 Mar 2011 at 2:38
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
taras.g...@gmail.com
on 24 Mar 2011 at 10:25