Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Note that the patch referenced in the aforementioned thread may be incomplete,
not so much functionally as aesthetically. It tweaks a bit of code which
follows this ominous comment:
/* ### this implies buckets cannot cross a fork/exec. desirable?
*
* ### hmm. it probably also means that buckets cannot be AROUND
* ### during a fork/exec. the new process will try to clean them
* ### up and figure out there are unfreed blocks...
*/
If I understand the point of the patch, it functionally makes this comment
stale -- but it doesn't amend/remove the comment itself.
Original comment by cmpilato
on 9 Jan 2013 at 8:28
Fixed in r1714. (change applied, comment updated)
Original comment by gstein
on 15 Jan 2013 at 11:50
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
cmpilato
on 11 Dec 2012 at 9:24