Closed melanieWacker closed 9 years ago
Rather than rehash the earlier discussion, which got a bit confusing, I would like to suggest a fresh approach. Let’s look at how BIBFRAME treats relationships, see http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe-relationships.html . Nevermind the discussion about work to work and so on, because none of that applies to MODS. But still, there is a model there for how to indicate relationship and that model might fit here.
For example:
Well I was looking to modsrdf to provide the properties in a MODS to BF transformation that were lacking in BIBFRAME for relationships. There are 2: references and isReferencedBy. So if we can have properties for all those that have enumerated values for type that would be helpful-- and then apply the rest.
From Working group call 10/03/2014: We will keep the properties we have defined in the current MODS/RDF but allow for addition of others not covered by MODS/RDF.
Formerly on https://github.com/blunalucero/MODS-RDF/issues/9