Closed melanieWacker closed 9 years ago
To question 2: Personally, I believe that we will need to carry over the granularity of parsing out the subelements in support of the many faceted interfaces that are currently in use.
See discussion from 12/12/14 conference call: https://github.com/blunalucero/MODS-RDF/wiki/MODS-RDF-Working-Group-Call-12.12.14
References: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/userguide/subject.html (MODS XML) Current MODS RDF: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/modsrdf/primer.html#subject Example of current conversion: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/modsrdf/examples/0006.rdf
1) We discussed authorities for names, but not for subjects. Does our approach work for subjects as well? https://github.com/blunalucero/MODS-RDF/issues/5 https://github.com/blunalucero/MODS-RDF/wiki/MODS-RDF-Working-Group-Call-10.03.14 See also Jeff's Linking to people example posted to the MODS RDF listserv on June 18, 2014
2) Subject has a number of subelements, such as topic, geographic, temporal, genre, etc. Do we need to parse this out in MODS RDF or only as a string?