the ÖK has shown the need to add castration as an attribute to an animal. Proposed was that "castration" should be added to the enumeration of "biologicalSexType". This does not seem correct, as castration is no sexType. Furthermore "biologicalSexType" should rather be simplified to only contain sex instead of mirroring businessLogic , e.g. value <"M_OR_F"> for "Männlich oder weiblich: In einigen Listen sind Tiere aufgeführt, die entweder weiblich oder männlich sein können.", <"NA"> and <"undefined">.
proposition to be discussed in AG Nutztiere: new element in sequence of
the ÖK has shown the need to add castration as an attribute to an animal. Proposed was that "castration" should be added to the enumeration of "biologicalSexType". This does not seem correct, as castration is no sexType. Furthermore "biologicalSexType" should rather be simplified to only contain sex instead of mirroring businessLogic , e.g. value <"M_OR_F"> for "Männlich oder weiblich: In einigen Listen sind Tiere aufgeführt, die entweder weiblich oder männlich sein können.", <"NA"> and <"undefined">.
proposition to be discussed in AG Nutztiere: new element in sequence of