Closed bmcfee closed 7 years ago
It's maybe better to wait until jams 0.3 to handle this, to avoid rewriting things twice.
Jams 0.2.3 adds some future-proofing for this, so it should be easy to have a smooth transition.
Bumping ahead to 0.1.4.
closed by merging #58
JAMS is likely to drop the pandas dataframe backing in the near future. Even in the short-term, pandas 0.20 breaks a variety of things involving in-place manipulation, so we should really just get out ahead of it and do things properly.