Reviewer Wolfe says: "TP Section 5, “Software Risk Issues”: “Most of the third party software…” Such as…?"
I actually considered listing the third party software and intentionally chose not to because (1) none of them actually are risks so why spend more time talking about them than necessary? and (2) IEEE standards recommend not repeating information that's already contained in reference documents, and our Project Plan is included in our references. Since she was only reviewing the MTP without looking at the PP, I can understand her confusion.So I'll ask you guys: do we want to cut and paste the software/IDE/etc we're using over to the risks section, or what?
Since the end user (the professor) has access to the PP, I think we are fine as it stands. From Wolfe's perspective, it is a fair comment, but I don't see a need to change it.
Reviewer Wolfe says: "TP Section 5, “Software Risk Issues”: “Most of the third party software…” Such as…?"
I actually considered listing the third party software and intentionally chose not to because (1) none of them actually are risks so why spend more time talking about them than necessary? and (2) IEEE standards recommend not repeating information that's already contained in reference documents, and our Project Plan is included in our references. Since she was only reviewing the MTP without looking at the PP, I can understand her confusion.So I'll ask you guys: do we want to cut and paste the software/IDE/etc we're using over to the risks section, or what?