The user discovered that the current cross-chain process does not support creating a group and binding it to a bucket/object through a multi-message in a single transaction. This is because they believed that the principal value only supports a group ID, not a group name.
However, this is actually supported, but it requires a specific naming convention to be followed. The format should be: grn:g:ownerAddress:groupName. We will update the corresponding principal value comment to support group names, to prevent any misunderstanding by developers in the future.
Description
fix: principal value supports group name comments
Rationale
The user discovered that the current cross-chain process does not support creating a group and binding it to a bucket/object through a multi-message in a single transaction. This is because they believed that the principal value only supports a group ID, not a group name.
However, this is actually supported, but it requires a specific naming convention to be followed. The format should be:
grn:g:ownerAddress:groupName. We will update the corresponding principal value comment to support group names, to prevent any misunderstanding by developers in the future.Example
Go-SDK
BSC Testnet transaction https://testnet.bscscan.com/tx/0xc983b0ef02796a9e0b6f3a7eb13fc2fbfe22895ba17fbd8a54f7becff8b2d183
Greenfield
Changes
Notable changes:
Potential Impacts
N/A