Closed o01eg closed 7 years ago
Not really. I build mainly on Windows, so haven't done much to the Unix build setup.
Feel free to remove the generated files in your PR!
There is one Makefile.in in the network folder as well!
I think yes. On linux, usually you are able to build with only configure and make.
Le 11/02/2017 12:24, O01eg a écrit :
Should source tree contains |configure|, |Makefile.in| and other autogenerated files with created by |autoreconf|?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bnordli/rftg/issues/47, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVd0ZIe41xWwb2HrGpTikbIX8P6vgV_bks5rbZpZgaJpZM4L-JrE.
Oh, I see, there are two pre-build steps, autoreconf and configure. In this case, perhaps it is best to keep the output of the first step, as Marsux said. (I am not very familiar with this process.)
Speaking as someone who is familiar with Linux build processes, the configure.in file is in the repository so that people doing development can update it as needed. The generated configure file is committed so that a non-developer can do a checkout and build without the full autotools suite being installed.
In the days before publicly visible repositories, the generated files might not have been checked in, but would still be part of the source code tarball.
Thanks for the input! Let's keep them, then!
I'll take a look at your PR when I have time.
Should source tree contains
configure
,Makefile.in
and other autogenerated files with created byautoreconf
?