bo-yang / plan9front

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/plan9front
0 stars 0 forks source link

the front falls off if disk is too small #75

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
when trying out 9front in a virtual machine like vmware, people
tend to give it a way too small disk because they dont know
about the dump filesystem.

turns out this is a very common error and we might take some
action in the installer to prevent it.

open for ideas :-)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by cinap_le...@felloff.net on 20 Jul 2011 at 8:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
idea 1. implement kfs in the installer / cwfs without the cw part
idea 2. warn about cwfs on small disks

Original comment by a...@phicode.de on 20 Jul 2011 at 7:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
users who simply want to take a test drive invariably balk at the requirement 
for a "huge" (> 1gb) partition. kfs might be a good option for ancient or 
embedded (think solid state disk) machines.

Original comment by stanley....@gmail.com on 20 Jul 2011 at 11:13

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The installer could offer the choice of kfs or cwfs, as aiju told, and warn if 
cwfs is selected for a small disk.
Or selected automatically based on the disk size.

Original comment by iru.mu...@gmail.com on 20 Jul 2011 at 11:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I vote for 2), disk space is plentiful and cheap, if people are cheap sissies 
and don't want to allocate enough space, they can fuck of and go use another 
crap OS. Also most VMs allow for sparse images.

Original comment by ur...@berlinblue.org on 18 Aug 2011 at 12:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by cinap_le...@felloff.net on 4 Nov 2011 at 11:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
but then ron will complain he doesn't have place for 9front on his chromebook :(

Original comment by 23h...@gmail.com on 30 Jul 2012 at 10:15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by a...@phicode.de on 10 Aug 2012 at 10:01