Closed maxbiostat closed 4 years ago
The sigma_sens
and sigma_spec
from the plots are the hyperpriors on the scale of variation of sensitivity and specificity on the log odds scale. mu_spec
and mu_sens
are fitted parameters.`
The actual values for everything is in the R script
Sorry I'm drag, but in this program, mu_sens
is passed as data and that's what confused me. Is it fair to say that in the newest iteration of the manuscript at least you don't fit the model in Equation (2)?
The first one that's actually fit is the one in appendix A.2.
This kind of thing's a lot clearer when the paper's generated directly from rmarkdown. I never got around to converting the straight LaTeX drafts, so sorry it's confusing.
All the data's there and this stuff's super fast to execute because the data's so small and the models so simple.
I never got around to converting the straight LaTeX drafts Neither did I for any of my papers/tech reports. I know it's probably best to have one master document, but this can get cumbersome at times.
Thanks for clarifying. I'll close the issue now.
I looked through the paper and the repo and could not find which values you guys used for
mu_spec
,mu_sens
,sigma_sens
andsigma_spec
. Would it be possible to know which values you guys used? Thanks and apologies if I missed something really obvious.