I am reasonably sure this fixes #8 because it maps from the hex code that identifies the pattern back to the corresponding int value. This is based on a single case where the constructed hex returned 0f where it needed to be 15, as discussed in #7. Untested!
I am reasonably sure this fixes #8 because it maps from the hex code that identifies the pattern back to the corresponding int value. This is based on a single case where the constructed hex returned
0fwhere it needed to be15, as discussed in #7. Untested!