bobthecow
commented
10 years ago Yeah, that'd be great! Let's go with option 1, as that's consistent with how the Ruby implementation works as well.
Open vhermecz opened 10 years ago
bobthecow
commented
10 years ago Yeah, that'd be great! Let's go with option 1, as that's consistent with how the Ruby implementation works as well.
Background: I've played with Genghis a while ago, and really liked its simple and clean UI, and source structure. As being more like a python person (than php or ruby), but being interested in ruby, I spent a few hours with understanding the ruby source, and porting it over to python.
I'd like to make this port available on Pypi, so this tool can reach more devs. So: opt1 is that I could give you a pull request, and give support in extending the current rakefile to also create a python package. opt2 - I'd use the client side app from your repo, and maintain/package/roll the python version myself. (guess i'd extract assets from genghis.rb if that's fine w you)