Closed koalie closed 3 years ago
Thank you for the feedback @koalie ! Yes, we should fix this.
The CSS WG and ARIA are discussed as examples, and what we have prior experience with. I think it would make sense to remove those subsections and have a more overreaching description of W3C work, and your input here is very relevant and valuable. We will follow up on this shortly.
Hi!
Here are a couple corrections: s/20 or so employees/60 or so employees/ s/Technical Plenary Advisory Committee/Technical Plenary and Advisory Committee meetings week/
It's not obvious why the guide puts the emphasis on "CSS WG" and "ARIA" as sub-topics.
Perhaps you'd be amenable to augment the paragraph above with something like:
<a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/activities">34 working groups and 10 interest groups</a> enable W3C to pursue its mission through the creation of Web standards, guidelines, and supporting materials, with over <a href="https://w3c.github.io/spec-dashboard/report.html">250 active specifications</a> tracked.