Closed holfordm closed 4 months ago
That should be fixed with the latest commit. All on qa now. However, I found a few odd places after having sorted them alphabetically. It seems like they don't have a title and are not clickable. Not sure if thats a problem with the data? I could probably hide them with a workaround - but maybe it would be better to have a look at the data first @irv?
On QA now, but looks like these are blank entries. https://charters-qa.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/?f%5Btype%5D%5B%5D=place
e.g.
<placeName type="index"/>
<placeName type="formInDocument"/>
<region type="parish"/>
<region type="county" key="place_000040">Lincolnshire</region>
<idno/>
<note type="charter"/>
</place>
should be fixed by e05da59d7c381ffbf7a908ca84287e79ca20ef1d
sorting in charters runs 1, 10, 11, which may be unavoidable (?), but 1, 2, 3, ... 10, 11 would be preferable if possible
seems like thats solved in the other catalogues through a sort_title field, which seems to work well for charters too. Will commit and push to QA.
Let me know if you are happy with that, and I can deploy it on live too maybe?
Looks good! baf1ceb91b8aa7e96a0a79724589df1d40f5e04b removes one more empty place
I think this is currently done according to xml:id / url - it would be more logical have have an alphanumeric sort if possible