Open george08 opened 7 years ago
@george08 i assume this is an item for the explorer not for backend data ingest.
If it is easier to fake this, the number of published digital records can just be updated in the summary spreadsheet manually.
Connected to #75
@mccarthymadsen could you please see how this feels now that we've made some tweaks to the numbers on show, and the copy?
I'm still seeing solo as showing only 74% catalogued. https://gfs-oxford-explorer.herokuapp.com/collections/bod-main Can you give me an example of where the numbers have changed?
We did a quick comparison last week between ES and the guesstimates (dm_int)... we made the basic decision to use the larger count.
bod-main: ES count [8885599] is bigger than dm_int [8702598] bod-digital-bodleian: ES count [6206] is bigger than dm_int [0] bod-oxford-university-reseseach-archive-ora: ES count [143000] is bigger than dm_int [0] bod-hebrew-manuscripts: ES count [287] is bigger than dm_int [0] bod-maps: ES count [140534] is bigger than dm_int [0] mhs-florey-collections: ES count [71] is bigger than dm_int [23] mhs-gunther-collection: ES count [168] is bigger than dm_int [0] mhs-rms-mhs-collection: ES count [550] is bigger than dm_int [0] mhs-radcliffe-observatory-archive: ES count [74] is bigger than dm_int [53]
3 days ago: "In some cases the Explorer shows what metadata we have as representing the % of collection catalogued, but it should be showing what metadata exists. See the drawing here for reference. Example: The SOLO collection https://gfs-oxford-explorer.herokuapp.com/collections/bod-main is actually 100% catalogued (column g=all), and we were give a sample of 73% of the metadata. Column M on the 'Sources' tab was originally on the 'collections' tab and explained whether what we have is everything or a sample."
https://github.com/goodformandspectacle/oxford-collections/issues/57