Closed mattpap closed 5 years ago
Fine w/ me the current name is pretty clunky even if clunky seems to be the standard for jlab things. @canavandl ?
+1 in general, but I'd also be happy enough if the new Python package containing the ipywidget to be called jupyter_bokeh
and to keep the repo name as is.
@philippjfr are there specific reasons you don't want to rename the repo?
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I'm very much in favor of renaming the repo, but if someone else objects at minimum I'd expect the new Python package (containing the ipywidget) to be called jupyter_bokeh
since it is not in any way limited to JupyterLab.
ok, I think we should rename the repo to match.
In light of PR #71, which makes this a dual jlab/nb extension, it would be nice to rename this repository to
jupyter_bokeh
and publish pip/conda/npm packages under that name. Currently references tojupyterlab_bokeh
are pretty sparse. For example in bokeh we have:Just to note, currently naming conventions in the jupyter community are all over the place, with some still using
ipy
prefix, that doesn't seem to be appropriate anymore in my opinion.@bryevdv, any thoughts?