Closed lina-kim closed 12 months ago
Might as well close. Makes sense to return to the original plan of custom artifact, split, followed by primer trimming. Unless I hear a strong case for binning?
Let's rethink this. The original one-step cutadapt binning method won't be possible without this feature or something along those lines.
If we could perform a simplified binning in a computationally efficient way, though, that would be great. The primary advantage is that we'd be able to run the workflow without requiring extensive inputs of the user: attaching a primer name, primer sequence, and a truncation length to every single sample. Binning allows us to have primer name/sequence/truncation length input completely separately from samples.
Original issue split primer trimming into #62. Cutadapt can't be used for binning as the QIIME 2 plugin requires an input artifact of type
MultiplexedSingleEndBarcodeInSequence
rather than theSampleData[PairedEndSequencesWithQuality]
used for sequences downloaded withq2-fondue
and typical of those downloaded from the SRA.Instead, use VSEARCH to bin primers, as suggested on the QIIME 2 Forum.-> the alignment-only method of VSEARCH isn't wrapped in the QIIME 2 ecosystem!To incorporate
in two stepsbefore denoising:Then primer/adapter trimming and QC (this one with MultiQC output)