Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It could be related to a potential problem arising after implementing #82. For backward-incompatibility reasons, users who already assembled contigs would need a way to rename those to follow the convention which will be introduced by the other issue.
Describe the solution you'd like
We need an action (rename-contigs) which would simply take a SampleData[Contigs] artifact, rename contigs and return a new SampleData[Contigs] artfifact - that way one could "easily" rename everything. This action should also take a parameter to specify the function used for renaming, as it was done in https://github.com/bokulich-lab/q2-assembly/issues/82.
Describe alternatives you've considered
The only alternative would be to export the pre-assembled data, rename "manually" and re-import - this would break the provenance though.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. It could be related to a potential problem arising after implementing #82. For backward-incompatibility reasons, users who already assembled contigs would need a way to rename those to follow the convention which will be introduced by the other issue.
Describe the solution you'd like We need an action (
rename-contigs) which would simply take aSampleData[Contigs]artifact, rename contigs and return a newSampleData[Contigs]artfifact - that way one could "easily" rename everything. This action should also take a parameter to specify the function used for renaming, as it was done in https://github.com/bokulich-lab/q2-assembly/issues/82.Describe alternatives you've considered The only alternative would be to export the pre-assembled data, rename "manually" and re-import - this would break the provenance though.