Closed book closed 10 years ago
Visually, this could be a second table, positioned below the main table, which shows "people who have 'just' fallen off"
"safe" and "active" only make sense for the "current" board. It is however computed for all chains in all contests. The "active" bit is actually unset for the "current" contest to avoid having a board with only green and yellow lines (and so, "active" users are shown in white in the "current" board).
The information about "safe" and "active" users is shown in the all-time and current year boards for the users whose longest chain is the currently "safe" or "active" one. I was thinking that we could start by only showing the fallen players in the other (i.e. not "current") boards.
Actually, it's possible to show the "fallen" authors in the normal current board, so long as their being there doesn't influence the ranking. I've therefore added an exception to the code that computes the ranking.
This is done in 765f3adaa8d3c3b78762b24aa04ad0dc1fe0d674 which is now live.
The boards currently show:
We could show in red the players who have made their latest release in the second-to-last bin, i.e. who have just failed the contest.
This poses some problems with the ranking, as these players shouldn't be ranked.