boostedsvj / Boosted-SVJ

boosted semi visible jets analysis
0 stars 0 forks source link

leading jets invariant mass and mass #1

Open snabili opened 4 years ago

snabili commented 4 years ago

Hi Thomas,

I started this issue on GitHub so we can journalize our study here. this thread is about the leading jets mass and the invariant mass of the signal samples.

this table shows the number of 1st, 2nd and 3rd leading jets that contains both dark quark and anti-quark in the filtered signal samples (mz=300 and rinv=0.3) for the pt > 500 AK8 jets:

image

chrispap95 commented 4 years ago

Update on samples - 5/28/2020

Samples generation went on hold last night. Most probably some FNAL server error. I have released the jobs and if they go on hold again I will investigate further.

Jobs:

stdout snippet:

%MSG-w XrdAdaptorInternal:  file_open 27-May-2020 23:43:21 UTC pre-events
Failed to open file at URL root://cmseos.fnal.gov:1094//store/user/lpcsusyhad/chpapage/filtered/RECO/step3_RECO_s-channel_mMed-100_mDark-10_rinv-0.3_alpha-0.2_HT400_13TeV-madgraphMLM-pythia8_n-1000_part-1111.root?tried=.
%MSG
----- Begin Fatal Exception 27-May-2020 23:43:21 UTC-----------------------
An exception of category 'FileOpenError' occurred while
   [0] Constructing the EventProcessor
   [1] Constructing input source of type PoolSource
   [2] Calling RootFileSequenceBase::initTheFile()
   [3] Calling StorageFactory::open()
   [4] Calling XrdFile::open()
Exception Message:
Failed to open the file 'root://cmseos.fnal.gov//store/user/lpcsusyhad/chpapage/filtered/RECO/step3_RECO_s-channel_mMed-100_mDark-10_rinv-0.3_alpha-0.2_HT400_13TeV-madgraphMLM-pythia8_n-1000_part-1111.root'
   Additional Info:
      [a] Input file root://cmseos.fnal.gov//store/user/lpcsusyhad/chpapage/filtered/RECO//step3_RECO_s-channel_mMed-100_mDark-10_rinv-0.3_alpha-0.2_HT400_13TeV-madgraphMLM-pythia8_n-1000_part-1111.root could not be opened.
      [b] XrdCl::File::Open(name='root://cmseos.fnal.gov//store/user/lpcsusyhad/chpapage/filtered/RECO/step3_RECO_s-channel_mMed-100_mDark-10_rinv-0.3_alpha-0.2_HT400_13TeV-madgraphMLM-pythia8_n-1000_part-1111.root', flags=0x10, permissions=0660) => error '[ERROR] Server responded with an error: [3011] Unable to open file /eos/uscms/store/user/lpcsusyhad/chpapage/filtered/RECO/step3_RECO_s-channel_mMed-100_mDark-10_rinv-0.3_alpha-0.2_HT400_13TeV-madgraphMLM-pythia8_n-1000_part-1111.root; No such file or directory
' (errno=3011, code=400). No additional data servers were found.
      [c] Last URL tried: root://cmseos.fnal.gov:1094//store/user/lpcsusyhad/chpapage/filtered/RECO/step3_RECO_s-channel_mMed-100_mDark-10_rinv-0.3_alpha-0.2_HT400_13TeV-madgraphMLM-pythia8_n-1000_part-1111.root?tried=
      [d] Problematic data server: cmseos.fnal.gov:1094
      [e] Disabled source: cmseos.fnal.gov:1094
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------
exit code 84, skipping xrdcp
snabili commented 4 years ago

Update 05/28/2020:

histograms of the AK8 jets mass passing from pt > 200 GeV and pt > 500 GeV cuts that contain both dark quark and anti-quark (red) and the first three leading jets (blue):

image

image

in both histograms the first three leading jets (h_sig_fatmass) have higher mean than all the jets passing the cuts requirements (h_jetmass)

chrispap95 commented 4 years ago

Update on samples - 5/30/2020

The samples with HT400 provided too low statistics so I submitted 100k events with HT100. GEN-SIM was submitted at 10:00 pm.

The job splitting was also improved.

snabili commented 4 years ago

update 06/01/2020 Mass of the jets including both qv/aqv for dR < 0.8 and pt > 200, 500 and 700:

image

Masses of the first three leading jets for the same cuts with both qv/aqv:

image

and finally comparison between first three leading jets and jets with both qv/aqv:

image

image

image

apparently the first three leading jets are more boosted than the other jets

snabili commented 4 years ago

07/09/2020

delta phi of 2nd leading jets (2LJet) and the closest jet to MET (ClosestJet): image

SoftDropTransverseMass: 2LJet and ClosestJet for signal samples:

image

clearly SoftDropTransverseMass is better than SoftDropMass there is a bump around SoftDropTransverseMass = 1000 GeV for ClosestJet still is not clear why it is there.

SoftDropTransverseMass signal and background (2LJet): image

SoftDropTransverseMass signal and background (ClosestJet): image

I've got some issues in plotting SoftDropTransverseMass using the subjets and trying to solve it next

Nsubjetiness: background shape is similar to the paper: image

image

pt bins and comparison signal and background: image not much difference with not binned samples: image

it might be that we don't have a really large signal samples and we are suffering from the stats