Open WarrenN1 opened 1 year ago
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/asio.hpp>
#include <boost/thread.hpp>
class AsyncMutex {
public:
AsyncMutex(boost::asio::io_context& ioContext)
: strand_(ioContext), locked_(false) {}
template <typename Handler>
void lock(Handler&& handler) {
strand_.post([this, handler = std::move(handler)]() mutable {
if (!locked_) {
locked_ = true;
handler(boost::system::error_code());
} else {
waitingTasks_.emplace_back(std::move(handler));
}
});
}
void unlock() {
strand_.post([this]() {
if (waitingTasks_.empty()) {
locked_ = false;
} else {
auto handler = std::move(waitingTasks_.front());
waitingTasks_.pop_front();
handler(boost::system::error_code());
}
});
}
private:
boost::asio::io_context::strand strand_;
bool locked_;
std::list<std::function<void(boost::system::error_code)>>
waitingTasks_;
};
int main() {
boost::asio::io_context ioContext;
AsyncMutex asyncMutex(ioContext);
// Create the first task
ioContext.post([&asyncMutex]() {
asyncMutex.lock([&asyncMutex](const
boost::system::error_code&) {
std::cout << "Locked in thread: " << boost::this_thread::get_id()
<< std::endl;
// Simulate some asynchronous operation
boost::this_thread::sleep_for(boost::chrono::milliseconds(2000));
std::cout << "Unlocked in thread: " <<
boost::this_thread::get_id() << std::endl;
asyncMutex.unlock();
});
});
// Create the second task
ioContext.post([&asyncMutex]() {
asyncMutex.lock([&asyncMutex](const
boost::system::error_code&) {
std::cout << "Locked in thread: " << boost::this_thread::get_id()
<< std::endl;
// Simulate some asynchronous operation
boost::this_thread::sleep_for(boost::chrono::milliseconds(3000));
std::cout << "Unlocked in thread: " <<
boost::this_thread::get_id() << std::endl;
asyncMutex.unlock();
});
});
// Run the ioContext to start executing the tasks
ioContext.run();
return 0;
}
Explanation: We define the AsyncMutex class that provides an asynchronous mutex implementation using Boost.Asio. The lock method takes a handler as a parameter and posts a task to the strand of the ioContext. If the mutex is not locked, it sets the locked flag to true and invokes the handler immediately. Otherwise, it adds the handler to the waitingTasks list for execution when the mutex is unlocked. The unlock method posts a task to the strand of the ioContext that checks if there are any waiting tasks in the waitingTasks list. If there are, it removes the first task from the list and invokes its handler. If there are no waiting tasks, it sets the locked flag to false. In the main function, we create an instance of AsyncMutex and an ioContext. We create two tasks by using the ioContext.post function and capturing the AsyncMutex instance by reference. Each task calls the lock method on the asyncMutex and provides a lambda function as the handler
This compiles?
Either way, maybe take a look at sam.
I don't think that library will end up boost however, but feel free to copy & paste.
I had a question about the following asynchronous mutex I am working on:
The goal of this is to be able to use mutexes on an io_ctx that uses multiple threads that may have to contend for shared resources. I think the above is correct. My primary concern is that in my await_ready() try_lock's behavior is technically undefined for a thread that already owns the mutex. In a scenario where say Thread1 is running async(f1()) who owns the mutex and suspends for some other reason, if Thread1 upon suspensions picks up async(f2()) which tries to acquire the mutex this could result in undefined behavior.