boostorg / boost_install

8 stars 32 forks source link

Meta-component "ALL" is printing superfluous warnings about missing Boost components #42

Closed DenizThatMenace closed 4 years ago

DenizThatMenace commented 4 years ago

I just tested the current Boost 1.73.0 beta1 version and came across the following inconvenience:

When using the new meta-component ALL (as in find_package( Boost 1.73.0 REQUIRED ALL CONFIG )) I get warnings about some Boost components for which the package configuration file is available and can be found but which says that the associated Boost component/library is not available (which is correct).

I was building Boost on Linux and the following Boost components are not available although their package-configuration files are created (and installed) when building:

I do not know if the associated package-configuration files (e.g. boost_fiber_numa-config.cmake) should not have been installed in the first place or if the find_package call should have been silent about them missing.

Whether these package-configuration files should be generated and installed or not, I realized that the internal find_package can only be silenced if the entire find_package( Boost ... ALL ... ) call has the QUIET option.

Is that how it is supposed to be?

It should not be too hard to patch BoostConfig.cmake to always search quietly for individual components when using the meta-component ALL. (I could provide a pull-request for it if desired.)

DenizThatMenace commented 4 years ago

Such a superfluous warning looks like this:

CMake Warning at /opt/boost/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Boost-1.73.0/BoostConfig.cmake:141 (find_package):
  Found package configuration file:

    /opt/boost/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/boost_fiber_numa-1.73.0/boost_fiber_numa-config.cmake

  but it set boost_fiber_numa_FOUND to FALSE so package "boost_fiber_numa" is
  considered to be NOT FOUND.  Reason given by package:

  No suitable build variant has been found.

Call Stack (most recent call first):
  /opt/boost/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Boost-1.73.0/BoostConfig.cmake:196 (boost_find_component)
  /opt/boost/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Boost-1.73.0/BoostConfig.cmake:252 (boost_find_all_components)
  CMakeLists.txt:58 (find_package)
pdimov commented 4 years ago

I see no such warnings in the Travis CI build.

https://travis-ci.org/github/boostorg/boost_install/jobs/675426098

https://github.com/boostorg/boost_install/blob/88b89e81651e3a92686717ad97b7020cbf316b5a/test/filesystem/CMakeLists.txt#L23

DenizThatMenace commented 4 years ago

I see no such warnings in the Travis CI build.

https://travis-ci.org/github/boostorg/boost_install/jobs/675426098

https://github.com/boostorg/boost_install/blob/88b89e81651e3a92686717ad97b7020cbf316b5a/test/filesystem/CMakeLists.txt#L23

I assume the reason is that all those find_package calls use the QUIET option.

In fact, the Travis CI log states that it uses the QUIET option explicitly:

...
17797  -- Found Boost 1.73.0 at /home/travis/.local/lib/cmake/Boost-1.73.0
17798  --   Requested configuration: QUIET REQUIRED COMPONENTS ALL
17799  -- BoostConfig: find_package(boost_headers 1.73.0 EXACT CONFIG REQUIRED QUIET HINTS /home/travis/.local/lib/cmake)
...
17880  -- BoostConfig: find_package(boost_fiber_numa 1.73.0 EXACT CONFIG  QUIET HINTS /home/travis/.local/lib/cmake)
17881  -- Found boost_fiber_numa 1.73.0 at /home/travis/.local/lib/cmake/boost_fiber_numa-1.73.0
17882  -- Boost toolset is gcc5 (GNU 5.4.0)
17883  -- Scanning /home/travis/.local/lib/cmake/boost_fiber_numa-1.73.0/libboost_fiber_numa-variant*.cmake
17884  --   Library has no variants and is considered not found
...

And I am pretty sure that option comes from FindBoost.cmake, because that is the only way I could reproduce this.

Try to add the CONFIG option to the find_package call you mentioned above (to force skipping FindBoost.cmake) and Travis CI should be able to reproduce the superfluous warnings I am addressing with this issue.

pdimov commented 4 years ago

You're correct, FindBoost uses QUIET.

pdimov commented 4 years ago

Should be fixed on develop.

DenizThatMenace commented 4 years ago

Without having it tested, your changes in https://github.com/boostorg/boost_install/commit/601755f2e81cff468caba515a8c1bbb9d0b00b8c (and https://github.com/boostorg/boost_install/commit/dc769f59a29aa87ed0580188147e2d08ed0aac48) look good to me.