Closed joaquintides closed 1 year ago
Reverse order sounds better. I'll take care of it for 1.82.0
IMHO #elif
s are better because defined(_STL_RESTORE_DEPRECATED_WARNING)
and defined(_MSC_VER)
are not mutually exclusive, so you end up silencing the same warning twice.
Addressed in 2286749f977e003f3ad996fef6ee50a29d8b8841.
The aforementioned file has the following macros for disabling and then restoring warnings:
Shouldn't the restore macros be written in reverse order, or else shouldn't the macros be applied in an exclusive manner by way of
#elif
s?