Open unixnme opened 2 years ago
Hello boost devs/maintainers,
I find the current push_back logic a bit strange with the two-steps
push_back
resize()
set()
I feel it would make sense to simplify this with a single step and reduce overhead
I'm not sure if this is intended, but if not, here is my pull request to address the issue.
Thanks.
Please rebase this on the current develop branch so that we can run the full set of tests against it. Thanks.
Hello boost devs/maintainers,
I find the current
push_back
logic a bit strange with the two-stepsresize()
method but using the default value = falseset()
method to explicitly set the bitI feel it would make sense to simplify this with a single step and reduce overhead
resize()
method with the given bitI'm not sure if this is intended, but if not, here is my pull request to address the issue.
Thanks.