Open marco-langer opened 2 years ago
@marco-langer Why closing?
@mloskot I wanted to discuss this PR with you before working on it again, but I thought currently the Boost 1.80 PRs are more important.
I think those structs belong to the detail namespace, but they are currently not. However, just moving stuff around would violate boosts deprecation policy, right?
So, some of my solutions:
OK. You can always turn PR to Draft.
Boost 1.80 PRs are more important.
Yes, indeed.
However, just moving stuff around would violate boosts deprecation policy, right?
Generally speaking, yes.
However, I doubt any user directly refers to base_channel_type_impl
type. We can not exclude such possibility though.
Let's postpone it.
Description
This PR moves base_channel_type_impl to detail namespace.
Tasklist