Closed Flamefire closed 2 years ago
The define at https://github.com/boostorg/locale/blob/b889b35645159e7ca9fa7d4e5ef32532fdb1a123/src/posix/numeric.cpp#L35 is not used.
Instead the non-prefixed one is used at https://github.com/boostorg/locale/blob/b889b35645159e7ca9fa7d4e5ef32532fdb1a123/src/posix/numeric.cpp#L125
@artyom-beilis Do you know which test should detect this problem?
Interesting and good question.
This is generic test of posix_formatting IIRC. But it looks like that fallback is working good enough so it wasn't found.
posix_formatting
The define at https://github.com/boostorg/locale/blob/b889b35645159e7ca9fa7d4e5ef32532fdb1a123/src/posix/numeric.cpp#L35 is not used.
Instead the non-prefixed one is used at https://github.com/boostorg/locale/blob/b889b35645159e7ca9fa7d4e5ef32532fdb1a123/src/posix/numeric.cpp#L125
@artyom-beilis Do you know which test should detect this problem?