Closed dodheim closed 5 years ago
so it may be more prudent to set the value to 1900 instead
I think that's wise, unless we can confirm that the fix was in RTM.
Do you want to change the value to 1900 or should I?
Hi, @dodheim @ericniebler
Thanks for the workaround for MSVC, but the MSVC recently emitted error due to this workaround. And we verified if removed it Boost/proto will build successfully. Can you merge this PR to Boost master branch to remove the workaround? Thank you very much.
This bug was fixed in VC++ 2013, the workaround is no longer necessary. I noticed the fix as of VC++ 2013 Update 2, so I don't know if the fix was in RTM or in an update, so it may be more prudent to set the value to
1900
instead...