Closed considered-useful closed 4 years ago
Since it was introduced in boost 1.43, boost::lower_bound has taken Value by value rather than by const ref. I wondered if there was a reason why, seeing as std::lower_bound takes its value by const ref
boost::lower_bound
Value
std::lower_bound
Since it was introduced in boost 1.43,
boost::lower_bound
has takenValue
by value rather than by const ref. I wondered if there was a reason why, seeing asstd::lower_bound
takes its value by const ref