Don't compare shared_ptr<> to 0

[vslavik]

Update the code to consistently use a check for .get() == 0, as was already done in most, but not all, places (presumably precisely because issues like this), to avoid issues with ambiguous overloaded operator== and operator!=.

The motivating example is use with JSON for Modern C++ that does some unfortunate operator overloading (see https://github.com/nlohmann/json/issues/610 for the respective bug) and this simple use of futures doesn't compile:

#define BOOST_THREAD_VERSION 4
#include <boost/thread/future.hpp>
#include <json.hpp>

int main()
{
    boost::future<nlohmann::json> f;
    f.get();
    return 0;
}

This fails due to ambiguous operators:

boost/thread/future.hpp:1683:31: error: use of overloaded operator '==' is
      ambiguous (with operand types 'future_ptr' (aka 'shared_ptr<detail::shared_state<basic_json<std::map, std::vector,
      basic_string<char>, bool, long long, unsigned long long, double, std::allocator, adl_serializer> > >') and 'int')
            if (this->future_ == 0)
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^  ~
test.cpp:11:7: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::future<nlohmann::basic_json<std::map, std::vector,
      std::__1::basic_string<char>, bool, long long, unsigned long long, double, std::allocator, adl_serializer> >::get'
      requested here
    f.get();
      ^
boost/smart_ptr/shared_ptr.hpp:814:31: note: candidate function [with T =
      boost::detail::shared_state<nlohmann::basic_json<std::map, std::vector, std::__1::basic_string<char>, bool, long
      long, unsigned long long, double, std::allocator, adl_serializer> >]
template<class T> inline bool operator==( shared_ptr<T> const & p, boost::detail::sp_nullptr_t ) BOOST_NOEXCEPT
                              ^
json.hpp:6334:17: note: candidate function
      [with ScalarType = int, $1 = 0]
    friend bool operator==(const_reference lhs, const ScalarType rhs) noexcept
                ^
json.hpp:6253:17: note: candidate function
    friend bool operator==(const_reference lhs, const_reference rhs) noexcept
                ^
1 error generated.

While it can be reasonably argued that this is an issue with the json class, I think this should be addressed in boost::future<> too, because

1. std::future<> doesn't have this problem
2. boost::future<> should arguably work with any movable time
3. it makes the code consistent, instead of being a mix of two kinds of null checks

(My preferred fix would be to compare to nullptr instead, but that can't be done for obvious compatibility reasons. I thought about using implicit bool conversion instead (if (this->future_)) but then I noticed the many existing uses of .get() == 0 already in there, so opted for continuing in that style.)

[viboes]

Ok, I accept the PR.

I would had preferred to have something like BOOST_NULLPTR having type boost::detail::sp_nullptr_t.