Closed schanzer closed 1 year ago
@schanzer wondering about the way you're naming images. looks like they have spaces in them. I seem to remember that file names with spaces break some of our build?
also, working on images for the pages where there's a graph with two labeled points. is this medium square file really too small? If I make it a big square file, it adds all sorts of extra grid lines that I don't think are helpful...
@flannery-denny I don't think filenames with spaces have been a problem for us in the past. If it turns out this is an issue, I'm happy to own the task of renaming.
Medium is fine. :)
@schanzer I'm planning to make one more matching activity for linear functions that has a mix of forms. Please confirm that the format of these pages is what you were expecting as I will likely move on to similar pages for quadratic functions tomorrow. Thanks!
@flannery-denny I took a close look at match-graph-si
and match-graph-sf
and they both look great. You are rocking this -- keep it up!
@schanzer please pull and take a look at exploring-linear-models/horizontal-shift.adoc
. I think I'm going to make a second page that focuses explicitly on distributing slope to h to find y-intercept, but lmk if it's not necessary. Thanks!
@schanzer also, I'm not seeing a use for pregenerating the images and tables we specked so I've removed the linear ones I hadn't made from this issue.
The random scatterplot generators are very helpful and allow me to easily make the images I need as I need them. I added one to our desmos library for linear scatterplots.
The plots I've needed for the pages I've made all had particular requirements that I was not aware of until I was in the middle of authoring.
If you disagree, feel free to put making those images back on my to do list.
@flannery-denny
Overall I really like the horizontal shift page! I made a few comments on the commit, and pushed another commit that implements those proposed changes. Feel free to revert if you want to discuss them. I'm interested to see how your quadratics version of this same page evolves, and whether it will make you want to change the focus of this one.
I'm totally thrilled that the random generators are helpful! I'm comfortable with you removing the remaining linear ones from your todo list.
@schanzer Thanks for the feedback. I like many of your changes. I've pushed a response based on the following thinking:
Happy to name the Desmos link but don't have a good name for the exercise yet.
@flannery-denny Please keep the level 2 section headers on this page consistent with those on other pages. Otherwise these changes all look good.
@flannery-denny these new pages are looking good!
match-graph-def
seems duplicative of match-graph-sf
. If you agree, can we remove the first one? def-2-points.adoc
looks great, but it feels like a missed opportunity not to use the points that students will have already encountered in the lesson (alaska
and alabama
). The whole point of this optional activity, in fact, was for students who struggled to complete the required page that asks them to build a model from those states. Can you update this to use those values instead?@schanzer
@schanzer I'm not into your recent commit to the matching pages that makes the images larger at the expense of having graphs with gridlines that don't line up touching each other...
I can think of two alternative options for making the images bigger:
Please lmk which works best for you before I tackle any other matching pages. Thanks.
@flannery-denny I'm not seeing them touch each other in the printed version, are you?
I thought you fixed the spacing for html and print. This is what I saw on html
and if that's how it's going to stay on the web, the current solution doesn't work.
I've just made the book at your suggestion and it looks passable in the printed version.
@schanzer I'm looking at the State Demographics Starter File and it feels like a mistake that we haven't used pct
as a prefix for college-or-higher
and hs-or-higher
given the way that the other columns are named
states-table = load-table: state, region, pop-2010, pop-2020, pop-trend, college-or-higher, hs-or-higher, pct-home-owners, num-households, num-housing-units, land-area, pct-non-english-at-home, mean-commute-time, median-income, per-capita-income, veterans, pct-female, pct-older-65, pct-under-18, pct-under-5, pct-in-poverty, poverty-rate
I definitely want to change it for Alg2. I'm wondering, can I just change the starter file? Or do I need make an algebra 2 copy?
@schanzer after much thought, I don't think the exploring linear models lesson should match the format for the other lessons, because, unlike quadratic, logarithmic and exponential functions, students will already have studied linear functions extensively so we are not introducing them here.
@schanzer In the notes for teachers file that's linked from the teacher resources section, we've suggested some columns for students to build that would make analyzing the states dataset more interesting.
If I understand correctly, Alg2 is working with a different copy of the states dataset than everyone else is? And we're trying to make this dataset rich for people with minimal programming? That makes me wonder whether we should add these columns to the Alg 2 version of the file?
pop-density
pct-change-pop
fyi - this surfaced because I was wondering about a correlation between veterans and population, but realized I was actually wondering about pop-density... and remembered that I'd just looked at the notes to see if we'd already suggested correlations for people to look for (we hadn't)
@schanzer I'm looking at the quadratic lesson and the tables that have been included...
In the lesson plan, neither of these are linear...
On Classifying Tables, I'm not seeing a single one of these that would make a line... and I think the choice between linear, quadratic, not a function is too narrow as some appear to be functions that are neither linear nor quadratic. Sorry to say that, without solutions provided, it's tough for me to tell which of the entries are typos and which are intentional.
Also, when we talked about what graphs we would include, you thought that sideways parabolas were beyond the scope of the lesson... but I'm seeing this in Classifying graphs and am not sure how you would expect people to answer it, which means it either needs to be removed or we need to offer support for teachers in facilitating a discussion about it.
@flannery-denny the first table is definitely a typo :) Please feel free to change the tables and graphs as you see fit -- I was under the impression these were on your todo list anyway.
As for the sideways graph -- yeah, let's get rid of it.
Thanks @schanzer How about this part of the question above?
I think the choice between linear, quadratic, not a function is too narrow as some appear to be functions that are neither linear nor quadratic
ok to change the third category to a catchall "Neither" or is "not a function" a learning goal for this lesson that needs to be maintained?
.
@flannery-denny I'm comfortable with neither.
@schanzer Now that I've finally wrapped my brain around what exists in the quadratics lesson and started digging into the work, I need to clarify a few things:
@flannery-denny definitely holding them off for this release, as per our conversation yesterday. You've also convinced me now that it makes more sense to introduce other forms after modeling, so by all means make the switch!
GitHub is always the best place to see prior work. For example, here's the entire git history for the quadratics lesson folder.
@schanzer I've pushed what I have in case you're excited to take this over the deadline today. Trying to make sense of what was here, what should stay, what should get added, etc. has been really hard.
Please do not put the linear stuff live on the web without looking at this page https://github.com/bootstrapworld/curriculum/commit/fa28bddcb646bd86860996a950e651b9d33bf011 and fixing the formatting.
As for quadratics, I've cut what needs to be cut. What's left feels like a mix of functionally skeletal and fleshed out.
The which form page I've pushed broke when I tried to make it into a table so that the graphs could be bigger and I was out of bandwidth for figuring out why so I switched it back.
I was thinking a scatterplot to form page for quadratics would use the same layout, but I'm not sure it makes sense with random scatterplots instead of a scatterplot from a starter file, because the point was to work toward modeling using different forms.
realizing that when my energy got reoriented from working on this checklist to sorting out the linear lesson plan, I moved on to applying that lens to trying to sort out the quadratic lesson and I hadn't looked at the checklist of proposed pages in a while.
I am happy to continue work on this next week. But I wanted you to have what I have in case you get a surge of wind and feel great urgency.
I think this release would be stronger if I could dig back into quadratics with a little distance next week and Rachel and I both had bandwidth to read exp & log.
@flannery-denny what page you do want me to look at? The link you shared is a git commit referencing multiple pages, and I'm not sure which one to check.
@schanzer exploring-linear-models/which-form.adoc
But I can deal with it as long as things don't have to be live 3 days ago.
@schanzer - Is the goal for the Given this form (standard, vertex, factored, etc), what is the vertex? What are the roots?
page to provide practice with this or teach students how to do it?
What's currently blocking the beta release of our Algebra 2 materials is a lack of low-hanging fruit: the bread-and-butter Algebra 2 standards that could easily be expressed and explored in the context of our explorations, but aren't (yet). Below is a checklist of those exercises.
glossary-terms.json
ES (NOTE: Related to the original Algebra 2 issue)Image and Table Library When creating charts and tables in Desmos, save links to the source files in `lessonName/langs/en-us/authoring/XYZ.adoc**
Linear
Quadratics
Exponentials - ES
Logarithms - ES