While I'm not looking for a solution like this for my own work (I'm happy using Rust), I want to congratulate you on it. It addresses the weaknesses in Go and the design decisions are excellent.
It also fills a need for what is many times discussed on the Rust forum, which is a language like Rust that has GC and is much simpler to use, Of course, Rust people would prefer Rust semantics rather than Go semantics, but I see that as a relatively minor issue.
Of course, to make this usable there are tons of tools need, LSP, etc. I hope there are people in the Go community who are motivated to help with this.
While I'm not looking for a solution like this for my own work (I'm happy using Rust), I want to congratulate you on it. It addresses the weaknesses in Go and the design decisions are excellent.
It also fills a need for what is many times discussed on the Rust forum, which is a language like Rust that has GC and is much simpler to use, Of course, Rust people would prefer Rust semantics rather than Go semantics, but I see that as a relatively minor issue.
Of course, to make this usable there are tons of tools need, LSP, etc. I hope there are people in the Go community who are motivated to help with this.