Open XanderLeaDaren opened 3 years ago
It would be very useful to have an unary inverse operator.
Currently I’m either:
-1
xʸ
1
SWAP
÷
inverse()
but it would be nice to have a dedicated INV function. I imagine that shift + ÷ would be a convenient key sequence for the implementation.
INV
shift
What you do think?
It would be very useful to have an unary inverse operator.
Currently I’m either:
-1
to the pile and using thexʸ
function then,1
to the pile,SWAP
ing and then pressing÷
inverse()
function for Matrices in the Toolbox!but it would be nice to have a dedicated
INV
function. I imagine thatshift
+÷
would be a convenient key sequence for the implementation.What you do think?