Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
well it is 10 digits from each digit can be 0-9. I don't know if I pasted a
correct form. =)
Original comment by erdemu...@gmail.com
on 29 Feb 2012 at 8:41
What is the validation rule?
Original comment by cedric.krier@b2ck.com
on 29 Feb 2012 at 11:27
There is no validation. I have checked with a person who is the head of a
regional tax office in Turkey. He said that there is no validation, the system
gives the next available number. Only thing is that they have previously
divided the numbers so that, if the company name starts with A the number
starts with 0, if it is B it starts with 1, if it is Y or Z it starts with 9,
etc. So there is no validation in your system that would work. Just 10 digits,
without any letters any digit can be between 0 and 9.
Also, It may not be related to you but OpenERP is using this script and it
gives the below error, when I edit the VAT number of a Turkish company.
ValidateErrorError occurred while validating the field(s) vat:This VAT number
does not seem to be valid.Note: the expected format is 'CC##' (CC=Country Code,
##=VAT Number)
It seems a script error but I assume this may return because there is no CC=TR
defined in your script. I believe if you can add an option that if the CC is
not in the list anything should be valid. That would be great.
Original comment by erdemu...@gmail.com
on 29 Feb 2012 at 2:33
As you say there is no validation so I don't see why we should include code
that does nothing.
You should ask OpenERP to fix their code to not try to validate something that
doesn't require validation.
Original comment by cedric.krier@b2ck.com
on 29 Feb 2012 at 3:07
You can validate if it is 10 digits and it is all numbers.
Original comment by erdemu...@gmail.com
on 29 Feb 2012 at 3:13
Ok, so you can submit a patch
Original comment by cedric.krier@b2ck.com
on 16 Apr 2012 at 6:55
Original comment by cedric.krier@b2ck.com
on 8 Nov 2012 at 11:35
I have done the patch for Turkish VAT number. I am attaching the patch.
Original comment by erdemu...@gmail.com
on 7 Jan 2013 at 8:51
Attachments:
vatnumber uses now python-stdnum, so new validation should be first proposed
there.
Original comment by cedric.krier@b2ck.com
on 3 Apr 2014 at 7:42
Original comment by cedric.krier@b2ck.com
on 3 Apr 2014 at 7:43
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
erdemu...@gmail.com
on 29 Feb 2012 at 8:15