Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 4 Nov 2011 at 10:26
Fixed/implemented.
Secondary backup is now written/read from the next available node. The
consequence is that for the improved availability the consistency is reduced:
* if a session stored in A got its backup in B
* then there's a network partition so that B is unavailable so that the backup
is stored in C
* B is available again (network partition resolved)
* A is not available, session is loaded from B
-> potentially outdated data is read from B
Potential solutions:
* somewhere (e.g. in the validity info) store where the last backup was stored
(would increase costs related to secondary backup)
* let the user choose between availability and consistency
The current implementation can be improved, submitted issue #117 for this.
Original comment by martin.grotzke
on 26 Dec 2011 at 11:04
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
reinw...@gmail.com
on 3 Nov 2011 at 3:51