botman / driver-telegram

BotMan Telegram Driver
MIT License
86 stars 75 forks source link

TODO: Improve documentation #80

Open feralheart opened 4 years ago

feralheart commented 4 years ago

In this issue I will collect everything what should be included into the documentation.

If you have suggestions send a comment to this issue.

Bot replies to a message: #62

blankster commented 4 years ago

Edit: I'm just recognizing that your question is directed to the telegram-driver and not how the general documentation could be improved. Most of my topics below are meant in general. But the first one with "inline keyboards" would be interesting for specifically Telegram. Ignore the rest if not helpful.

Thanks for creating this issue :) Some topics I've got in mind:

If there are clarifications needed, please let me know :)

feralheart commented 4 years ago

Thank you @blankster for your comment, these are very good topics :)

vdomah commented 4 years ago

Hi, not sure if this is right place to ask, but is this package maintained really? I see a bunch of useful pull requests including 2 of mine, but they don't seem to be reviewed by the maintainer. But there are more and more improvements I personally do in this package using it in my projects. So I'm forced to use my own fork. For example I'm developing a lot with Inline Mode and for now this package doesn't support it at all.

What does botman community thinks of this problem?

blankster commented 4 years ago

@vdomah I'm also not sure if this is the right place for such a discussion but share your feelings and situation. In general, I think Botman is very unique and powerful and it's a pity that there isn't more active development. Also when I look at https://botman.io/forum/d/8-botman-3-0-feature-wishlist, I'm not sure if this version 3 will be ever released. I've tried in private to get into a conversation with the maintainer (Marcel) but wasn't successful getting a reply.

But I also totally understand that he has a lot of other ideas/obligations/projects/priorities as it seems (I personally think that's the reason) and appreciate everything Botman already does and I'm thankful for all the efforts involved people provided. He doesn't own us anything and Botman is a free and open-source solution, we've luckily the option to fork it and improve it as we want. We (with our project) are not at the stage that we can contribute back, but good quality given, I personally think at least good pull-requests should be merged into the project. In general, I try not to expect anything and am happy about everything good that happens.

I would love to talk about Botman development with you if you want, maybe this would be an interesting conversation. Feel free to hit me on Telegram by http://t.me/blankster.