search

bounswe / bounswe2018group9

Actopus - an activity social octopus
14 stars 6 forks source link

Compliance with Annotation Protocol #431

Closed gumityolcu closed 5 years ago

gumityolcu commented 5 years ago

Hello everyone, I have failed big time by suggesting it is not required for us to comply fully with the annotation protocol documentation. It is clearly stated in the project description given by the customer. Sorry for that.

I will be working on the backend implementation and will try to get it working quickly.

srknzl commented 5 years ago

I have realised this today also. It is good to see that you are intended to do this since it may affect our final score

gumityolcu commented 5 years ago

@srknzl @okyksl

Guys, I have been reading the documents for the past day. I can't say I really understood it. There are some parts that I think I got right but some parts which give me nothing but question.

I can start implementing the parts I understood, like Annotaiton collections and pages. But I think I better not. This is because, even if I start doing it, there is no guarantee that I will be able to deliver a smoothly working code in time, without any bugs etc. Even if I do, the frontend will need to change, there is no guarantee this will be done smoothly in time. Even if the frontend changes, we will still not be complying fully with the document and all the work will depend on how I understood the document which is probably full of error.

I think it is strategically more logical for me to start contributing on the final report rather than trying the work this out.

I am abandoning this feature because of these reasons.

I apologize again for suggesting we can ignore the details of this document, I should have re-read the description.