Closed lightbeard closed 8 years ago
@lightbeard, hey, good catch, thanks. We will add support for all of these browsers.
And yes, bowser is working as designed. We need support browser detection process manually. In most cases bowsers' assumptions are true, but sometimes there are special cases like those in the issue.
sleipnir Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.95 Safari/537.36 Sleipnir/6.1.4
k-meleon Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20140105 Firefox/24.0 K-Meleon/74.0
greenbrowser Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.2; GreenBrowser)
deepnet Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.2)
slimbrowser Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko
Is bowser working as designed?
Basically we don't see how the browser level checks such as
bowser.msie
andboswer.firefox
can be trusted at all.