Closed bpbond closed 4 years ago
Other suggestions
Data counts against DOY (e.g., how well are 'non-growing seasons' covered) - because presumably one key application of this dataset would be to understand flux trends within a year (maybe even more so than over several years because many sites I assume have just a year of data).
How much representation across terrestrial climate space (site MAT MAP plotted across a MAT MAP space; pretty sure I've seen this in one of your other papers). But this isn't as important as the last bullet because the strength of this dataset is coverage over time and not space
figure 1:
figure 3:
From co-author Tarak El-Madany:
I really like the waffle plot one of the best graphs to show which and how many ecosystems are covered in a given year.
Wow, all three are great, but the DOY one is my favorite. Nice coverage across MAT too.
Dang those DO look great. 👏 Nice job @stephpenn1 !
A couple suggestions:
geom_density2d
, or coloring (grey scale) by number of points in that degree bin, or ...?Thanks! Great suggestions, Ben. How about something like this? Also open to suggestions on the type of geom to use here instead of a line. Unless you like the style as is
Nice! That's really informative. I think line is fine for now. Let's have the Y access say "Number of observations" please, but otherwise, looks great.
Alexis Renchon offers this as a nice example, from Beringer et al. 2016: