Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
Currently, no-inclusive-gateway is a rule in the recommended set. However, the documentation does not give grounds why this element should be disallowed. I couldn't find any sources which would discourage usage of this gateway. This has already caused confusion on Camunda forum.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
Currently,
no-inclusive-gateway
is a rule in the recommended set. However, the documentation does not give grounds why this element should be disallowed. I couldn't find any sources which would discourage usage of this gateway. This has already caused confusion on Camunda forum.Describe the solution you'd like
Add grounds why rule exists and should be used.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Remove the rule from the recommended set, but it has already been decided against in https://github.com/bpmn-io/bpmnlint/issues/41#issuecomment-580213851
Additional context
https://forum.camunda.org/t/linter-plugin-error-element-has-disallowed-type-bpmn-inclusivegateway/23320