Open dgagne opened 11 years ago
Oct 9, 2103 Webmeeting o Aurélien, the issue originator, mentioned that this issue was raised for clarification purposes from his observation of differing serializations from various tools. o Discussion confirmed that there was no need for this duplication of information, that the current BPMN MIWG test cases did not do that duplication, and the current reported test results from the various vendors did not carry that duplication. o A proposal for a clarification text and its location within the spec will be prepared for the RTF
Hello,
as agreed upon, I'd like to suggest this proposal: [defunct link] Update 2016-05-16: Added the proposal as an attachment because the link is not working anymore: Proposal.docx
Best Regards,
Matthias
Webmeeting 23 Oct 2013 o The proposal will be modified to explain that this issue was de-scoped to two more use cases of containment
As agreed upon, I made the extended scope explicit.
Webmeeting 6 Nov 2013 • Proposal Accepted
http://www.omg.org/issues/bpmn2-rtf.open.html#Issue18256