Open avodonosov opened 4 years ago
I'm sceptical about adding octal literals unless there's an actual need. I consider them an ugly relic of a bygone era when some machines had word lengths that were multiples of 6 bits rather than 8. They are limited to just Latin-1: they can't even cover the whole (16-bit) range of a Java char.
59 and #60 implement unicode escapes in character and string literals.
How about octal escapes?
I discovered that both clojure language reader and the edn reader from the official clojure github project - https://github.com/clojure/tools.reader - support this.
(Octal escapes in string literals come from Java, only that Java syntax for that is backlash followed by up to 3 digits, while in Clojure and in tools.reader exactly 3 digits are required.).
In string literals the syntax is baclash followed by 3 digits: \NNN. The first digit can be between 0 and 3, the last two digits are between 0 and 7.
For character literals the syntax is \oNNN. Again, the first digit is between 0 and 3, the last two are between 0 and 7.
The poposal in https://github.com/edn-format/edn/pull/65 also includes octal escapes.
Not to say I personally need to use octal literals in my code. Just FYI. It may be good to have some consistency between EDN implementations.