braden-w
commented
2 weeks ago Great feature request and it seems like the API is compatible! I'll put this on queue and hopefully have an opportunity to work on it this month!
Open Arche151 opened 3 weeks ago
braden-w
commented
2 weeks ago Great feature request and it seems like the API is compatible! I'll put this on queue and hopefully have an opportunity to work on it this month!
Arche151
commented
2 weeks ago @braden-w Yayy, happy to hear that!
OLH21
commented
2 weeks ago I think the GroQ API is also compatible , maybe you could add the en point in the settings ?
quickreactor
commented
1 week ago This is my most wanted feature! Glad to see it getting some traction, I use the app all the time!
AlpSantoGlobalMomentumLLC
commented
14 hours ago I think a configurable URL without any guarantees for compatibility would be a nice ... I would personally start to test GroQ ... https://wow.groq.com/groq-runs-whisper-large-v3-at-a-164x-speed-factor-according-to-new-artificial-analysis-benchmark/
AlpSantoGlobalMomentumLLC
commented
13 hours ago I think in the following file it is needed to get 3 configuration options: recorder.svelte.CMw7ZXBL.js
The option to change the URL
transcribe: (e,{apiKey: t, outputLanguage: n})=>L(function() {
var a;
if (!t.startsWith("sk-"))
return yieldnew B({
title: "Invalid API Key",
description: 'The API Key must start with "sk-"',
action: {
label: "Update API Key",
goto: "/settings"
}
});
const r = e.size / (1024 1024);
if (r > Hh)
return yieldnew B({
title: The file size (${r}MB) is too large,
description: Please upload a file smaller than ${Hh}MB.
});
const s = new File([e],xC)
, o = new FormData;
o.append("file", s),
o.append("model", "whisper-1"),
n !== "auto" && o.append("language", n);
const i = yield*$e({
try: ()=>fetch("https://api.openai.com/v1/audio/transcriptions", {
Feature request
I'd like to propose adding an option to use this local faster-whisper-server instead of the OpenAI API. The faster-whisper-server is OpenAI API compatible, which suggests that implementing this option should be relatively straightforward and require minimal modifications to the existing code.
This addition would provide users with an alternative that could offer:
I understand this might be a niche request, but it could be valuable for users who prefer local processing or have specific performance requirements.
Thank you for considering this feature. I would highly appreciate, if you were able to implement it!