Open pbishwakarma opened 1 year ago
@pbishwakarma and @carolth: it's in standard MOWG form now but could use a content check.
Hi, I was using this PT to create a google sheet and create a linkml model.
A couple things that I noticed:
sub domain name
could be simply "Project", "Person", etc. instead of "Project Metadata", "Person Metadata", etc.DataCollection
the sub domain name
is "Project Metadata"definition
and short description
. I'm not completely sure what is teh meaning of short description
. Often this is almost the same as definition
, sometimes is enough different that I wouldn't guess that they describe the same fielddata type
has "[]", that means that it is multivalueddata type
field, name is just a stringaccessControl
, two of them have "enum" in data type
, but without specifying the name of enum. I have only one ValueSet
, that is called "accessControl" with values only, no description, no extra information, so not sure how would you like to map thisHi Dorota,
Thanks for the comments, this had totally fell off my radar. I will update this doc based off your comments and some review.
[]
should be multivaluedcontact
for a project, that can be either a Person or an Organization. The value that serves as the join key is the name
of the Person or Organization entity.@pbishwakarma - btw. I was also trying to identify the elements that I could find in the Data Catalog (or nemo website that DC points to) and in the google doc that I used to create linkml model from I created tab Checks: Slots
to make some notes (see column k and l): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dCFxzpLBReauJYIinCs_xZlTckpJWFx5nxSTFAe-vvE/edit?usp=sharing
Happy to meet next week if you're planning to work on it and want to discuss. I was also told to look at the Dandi model and see what things could be also taken from there if useful.
@pbishwakarma - btw. I was also trying to identify the elements that I could find in the Data Catalog (or nemo website that DC points to) and in the google doc that I used to create linkml model from I created tab
Checks: Slots
to make some notes (see column k and l): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dCFxzpLBReauJYIinCs_xZlTckpJWFx5nxSTFAe-vvE/edit?usp=sharing
Got it, there are definitely some parts of the data model that are not being used currently (either they contain no data or just aren't being displayed in the UI) - I will update this PR before the working meeting on Wednesday if you want to discuss specifics about those nuances then.
Happy to meet next week if you're planning to work on it and want to discuss. I was also told to look at the Dandi model and see what things could be also taken from there if useful.
I think we took a stab at a similar exercise in the BICCN repo a while back, at least for mapping fields from our model to the archives' models, might be useful: https://github.com/BICCN/BCDC-Metadata/blob/83b00c19d21a7ef73196936a7b8e66b8637e59ee/design/schema/mappings.csv
Got it, there are definitely some parts of the data model that are not being used currently (either they contain no data or just aren't being displayed in the UI) - I will update this PR before the working meeting on Wednesday if you want to discuss specifics about those nuances then.
Great, thank you!
I think we took a stab at a similar exercise in the BICCN repo a while back, at least for mapping fields from our model to the archives' models, might be useful: https://github.com/BICCN/BCDC-Metadata/blob/83b00c19d21a7ef73196936a7b8e66b8637e59ee/design/schema/mappings.csv
yes, I think I even created the column for Dandi :) it was just before I knew anything about BICCN or BICAN
btw., perhaps you could update in google doc in the Slots
tab, since I already fixed some of the issues: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dCFxzpLBReauJYIinCs_xZlTckpJWFx5nxSTFAe-vvE/edit?usp=sharing
Also, for the model, I would need more about the Classes
Adding back in project and data collection for review according to issue process.
Closes #21