dosumis
commented
11 months ago Cautionary note....
- this would mean that accessions above the hierarchy level, change every time the hierarchy changes & also every time the labelset changes.
There's a reasonable case for this. The object being annotated has changed - but also a cost in complexity and perhaps confusion. Cell sets could have the same metadata attached between versions, but IDs would not be stable.
We should document use cases./ scenarios for resolution.
cell set accession recipe:
{labelset}:{blake2hash(sorted_ids)}
See: https://github.com/cellannotation/cell-annotation-schema/issues/71#issuecomment-1854462981
We no longer need incremental IDs.
No need for change to CAS as we will use existing field.