Open adamltyson opened 3 years ago
Yeah, the main reason for having the resolution in the name is mostly for atlases that come with different resolutions - eg, pretty useless for the zebrafish one. I guess that for a non-isotropic atlas that come in only one resolution it would not be very meaningful in general, as one atlas at multiple resolutions in my head make sense only if resampling is involved, at which point the atlas probably would not be anisotropic anymore
Makes sense to me. The resolution could be optional, thus only enforcing additional, resampled atlases to be isotropic? If we needed an additional, resampled anisotropic atlas, that could just have a different name.
yes, that would make sense for me!
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 11:49, Adam Tyson @.***> wrote:
Makes sense to me. The resolution could be optional, thus only enforcing additional, resampled atlases to be isotropic? If we needed an additional, resampled anisotropic atlas, that could just have a different name.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/brainglobe/brainglobe-atlasapi/issues/246, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACPLDVHQZOY7GGVNGWX4U6TT36QDJANCNFSM5BWACSQA . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&utm_campaign=notification-email .
At this line, the atlas name uses the first resolution value: https://github.com/brainglobe/bg-atlasgen/blob/f944baaf69004aca270c29dee50592369969db72/bg_atlasgen/wrapup.py#L111
This isn't particularly useful for non-isotropic atlases, but I'm not sure what would be better.