codecov[bot]
commented
2 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 92.72%. Comparing base (
6044656) to head (e7d448b).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #97 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 92.72% 92.72% ======================================= Files 37 37 Lines 1855 1855 ======================================= Hits 1720 1720 Misses 135 135 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/brainglobe/brainglobe-utils/pull/97/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=brainglobe) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [numba](https://app.codecov.io/gh/brainglobe/brainglobe-utils/pull/97/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=brainglobe) | `92.66% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=brainglobe#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Before submitting a pull request (PR), please read the contributing guide.
Please fill out as much of this template as you can, but if you have any problems or questions, just leave a comment and we will help out :)
Description
What is this PR
Why is this PR needed? Linting is failing in #96 due to instance checks being flagged as an error now.
What does this PR do? Fixes the linting error.
References
How has this PR been tested?
Linting passes with the new ruff version, all tests pass, and visual inspection confirms the function still returns the correct subset of layer types.
Is this a breaking change?
No
Does this PR require an update to the documentation?
No
Checklist: