bramdejager / spcb

The SharePoint Client Browser (SPCB) uses the CSOM to connect to a remote SharePoint site collection and shows the site structure with related properties and values.
GNU General Public License v2.0
173 stars 48 forks source link

Defender flags SPCB.exe v3.2 as Trojan:Win32/Bluteal.B!rfn #83

Closed bdgit closed 5 years ago

bdgit commented 6 years ago

Today, 6/5/2018, Windows defender flagged and quarantined SPCB.exe v3.2.

as Trojan:Win32/Bluteal.B!rfn

cangot commented 6 years ago

I raised a similar issue : https://github.com/bramdejager/spcb/issues/82

vman commented 6 years ago

The information from this thread suggests Windows Defender might be giving a false positive for unsigned dlls/exes.

Checking SPCB.exe, it indeed doesn't have a strong name:

image

Benny56 commented 6 years ago

v3.7 is also flagged

bramdejager commented 5 years ago

The information from this thread suggests Windows Defender might be giving a false positive for unsigned dlls/exes.

Checking SPCB.exe, it indeed doesn't have a strong name:

image

There is indeed no strong signing happening. I don't have a proper certificate to perform code signing. Singing it with a self-signed certificate creates other problems and does not solve this.

I'm curious if this is still an issue at the moment? Can anyone comment?

bramdejager commented 5 years ago

Received no reply anymore, closing the issue for now.

webash commented 5 years ago

I can confirm that Windows Defender (ATP, too) is still flagging this application as suspicious, likely due to the lack of DLL/code signing. I was reviewing a recent alert in WD ATP on @vman 's machine (we work together). Let me know if I can provide any information from the alert's that might help stop such false positive flagging in lieu of the expense/effort of code signing.

webash commented 5 years ago

@bramdejager we're still hitting this occasionally and it briefly gives me a fright until I remember this. If there isn't a solution without a code signing certificate, perhaps sponsorship could solve the funding gap for the cert? :) (perhaps I could see if there's an appetite to arrange that)