Open imrefazekas opened 8 years ago
Would you add some tests for the new oval syntax.
Also if I read this correctly, if I prefix the actor name with o- then it becomes a oval. I wonder if that is the most obvious/sensible way to do this.
Also if I read this correctly, if I prefix the actor name with o- then it becomes a oval ---- yes. I use it to make differentiate actors dealing with internal communication or external as well. Whether they possess interface open to the public... The signal came from the world of UML actually or at least has a good association with the connected circle of UML. :) I do the tests asap....
Test added.
You branch has conflicts. Can you rebase from master, so I can merge.
I will look over the code more, but I want to think more about this if this is the right syntax to be using.
Done, hopefully the correct way...
I was wondering if we could introduce some syntax to add stereotypes in some way ...
Changed the prefix to () to mark it as circle. And I also introduced <> to mark it as rhombus. Better fitting syntax I think...
I also extended the grammar to able to express special actors drawn with ellipse.